Find new friends and connections here
The sudden deferral of a proposal to commemorate Mark Ashton, a notable LGBTQ+ and miners' rights campaigner native to Portrush, has incited significant frustration among members of the Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council. The postponement, allegedly due to unspecified external pressures, has raised concerns about setting a "dangerous precedent" within the council's decision-making processes.
Mark Ashton, who relocated from Portrush to London in the late 1970s, became a prominent figure in the Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners (LGSM) group during the UK miners’ strike of 1984-1985. Ashton played a critical role in fostering solidarity between the LGBTQ+ community and striking miners, highlighting the intersectionality of their struggles. Despite his untimely death at 26 in 1987, his legacy as an ardent activist for LGBTQ+ and workers’ rights continues to resonate profoundly, inspiring films like "Pride" which showcased the historical alliance.
In 2021, the council had passed a motion recognising Ashton's contributions with plans to allocate funds and designate a site for a memorial, in consultation with his family and relevant LGBTQ+ groups. A public petition supporting this action amassed 28,972 signatures, demonstrating extensive public endorsement for the cause.
The council’s Memorial Advisory Group had reviewed proposals for two potential commemorative sites in Portrush: a plaque at Portrush Town Hall and a mural with a small garden within Antrim Gardens. However, the anticipated decision regarding the Town Hall plaque was unexpectedly removed from the agenda of May’s Leisure and Development Committee meeting, with the promise to revisit the topic in June.
This delay provoked backlash from several councillors, including Sinn Féin’s Cara McShane, who expressed discontent over procedural transparency.
"We are sitting here in May 2023 and we are made complete fools of as representatives within this council, who have a mandate to represent our constituents,"
she argued, questioning the rationale behind the postponement.
Committee members were informed that new information had emerged, prompting the chief executive to recommend further review. However, the specifics of this information remained undisclosed, leaving councillors like Ashleen Schenning and Peter McCully understandably frustrated. The lack of clarity surrounding the deferral has left the council members speculating about potential political influences infringing upon their proceedings.
Darryl Wilson from the DUP underscored the need for transparency, questioning whether legal or external challenges influenced the decision, ultimately stressing the members' right to clarity and openness.
Local LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have voiced their concerns over the deferral, emphasising the importance of recognising Ashton’s contributions to both LGBTQ+ rights and broader social justice movements.
"Mark Ashton's work bridged communities and highlighted shared struggles. Delaying his commemoration does a disservice to his memory and diminishes the message of unity he stood for."
The narrative unfolding within the council chambers reflects broader tensions and apprehensions regarding the influence of outside pressures on local governance. Historically, such deferrals have sometimes stemmed from political hesitations or fear of controversy, but without transparency, these reasons remain speculative.
In response to the delays, council members and community advocates are exploring options to push for a timely resolution. These include demanding clearer communication from the council’s leadership and mobilising further public support to ensure that Ashton's legacy is honoured appropriately.
Without resolution, these delays risk undermining public trust in the council's commitment to honouring activists whose legacies continue to inspire. As discussions continue, the community remains poised to advocate for the recognition of a figure whose work symbolised progressive values and community solidarity.